Click here to break out of Frame
Bullies, we face them at all ages. The Skippy story for Kids
| CPC/Bestfoods and Judge
Richard Williams seem to be oblivious to the meaning of
the First Amendment. Such an attitude from a multinational corporation with CPC/Bestfoods poor track record is not unusual. But for a jurist to tramp all over someone's first amendment rights, as has been the case here, is totally unacceptable. It is my view that jurists who do not understand the importance of the first amendment should be removed. Just last week (this is being written on 9-12-99) another judge ruled on Ford Motor vs. www.Blueovalnews.com in favor of www.BlueOvalNews.com. Read about it at Ford Motor Company .vs. BlueOvalNews In light of this and a great deal of other precident it is clear that the order in 1986 is prior restraint on the Crosby-Tibbetts first amendment rights. But it gets worse when the judge interpets the 1986 order to be grounds to hold Mrs. Tibbetts in contempt for telling the history of the case on a web site. See Exhibit B (first filing) and Exhibit A (second filing). |
|
| But the story gets even better when the judge expands the scope of his orginal order with the ORDER 9-7-99. In this order they attempt to gag unnamed third parties. |
Skippy is a registered trademark of Skippy Inc.
 |
Ronald J. Riley
|